Archive for November 2014

Court Update: Possible Felony Charges Against WSLCB Board Members?

By Arthur West, John Novak

(Olympia, WA) After finding 17 violations of the Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) on Oct. 31st, the Thurston County Superior Court went after the Washington State Liquor Control Board (WSLCB) twice this week, first on Tuesday denying their motion to dismiss the OPMA knowledge claims for civil penalties, based upon the newly disclosed records that I reviewed and filed on the 10th.

The Court also started talking about individual “Mens Rea” of the LCB Board members, a legal term used exclusively in criminal prosecutions that literally means, “guilty mind”.

It appears the court has become distressed at all of the lying and wants to fry someone now.

Having the judge seek to establish “mens rea” is never a good thing and does not happen in a normal civil case.

On Friday, there was an opinion announced in a 20 minute long statement by the court. The Court ruled that the LCB withheld records from the I-502 Rulemaking File and that they should all be disclosed.

This is bad for the rules because it undermines the legitimacy of the rules, and bad for the LCB because they altered the file to attempt to remove the disputed records rather than disclose them.

Now, not only have they violated the Puplic Records Act (PRA), they have also altered and concealed official public records in violation of RCW 10.14, which is technically a felony if anyone in law enforcement would ever charge a violation.

Even so it is very embarrassing for them and the poor Assistant Attorney General Bruce Turcott looked like someone had just sodomized his puppy.

With over 500 penalty days and a criminal offense I am just dying to brief on appeal, they simply cannot risk what the Court of Appeals would do, even without the I-502 rule repercussions.

I am anticipating a penalty of 15-40 thousand, plus a real problem for them with the altered rule making file.

How can you review an altered file and a record of a bunch of unrecorded secret meetings?

Stay tuned…


Related Court Documents
(If you are unable to read or download the files below through Scribd, you will also find them HERE)

11-21-14 West v. Liquor Control Board

11-21-14 Arthur West Invoice

11-18-14 Arthur West v. LCB

11-18-14 Arthur West Invoice

Judge Finds WSLCB Broke the Law 17 Times Making I-502 Rules

By Arthur West, John Novak

(OLYMPIA, WA) The Washington State liquor Control Board violated the Open Public Meetings Act 17 times between January and March of 2014, a Thurston County Superior Court Judge ruled on Friday, October 31st.

The meetings were “private” stakeholder meetings with law enforcement, the prevention community, and city and county officials that a quorum of the LCB commissioners attended to obtain input on the proposed I-502 rules.

They were scheduled separately during the daytime in the same areas that the Commission held 7 public forums on I-502 implementation in the evenings.

The Court declined to invalidate the rules despite evidence of testimony by LCB’s Rick Garza before the Legislature that a lot of the work on the rules was done in the daytime meetings. The plaintiff, Arthur West (420leaks contributor), had maintained that the many secret meetings seriously undercut the validity of the I-502 rules.

A second hearing is set for the 18th of November on the issue of whether the violations were deliberate, and whether the Board Members will be subject to civil penalties. Fines would be $100 for each of the 17 violations.

Here is the ruling, (Liquor Control Board OPMA Ruling) The part about the violations is handwritten in on the bottom of page 2.

Liquor Control Board OPMA Ruling by 420leaks

Also attached is some background on one typical law enforcement meeting, a list of the prevention meetings, and a prevention meeting agenda.

In the last two months, Arthur West has been to court FOUR times to compel them to answer discovery under penalty of perjury. Now there are a bunch of new records that have not previously been disclosed.

The contents of some reveals more than just secret meetings.

The first shows WASAVP (Washington Association for Substance Abuse and Violence Prevention) and NW HIDTA (Northwest High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area) members (and the Washington State Patrol) “openly” conspiring to Kill the medical cannabis laws in the state!

“”Below are other issues raised by the WASAVP;  the key one being the repeal of the Medical Marijuana Statute that would eliminate a big headache for law enforcement.””

“Repeal of the current medical marijuana statute which is rendered redundant with the passage of 1-502 and allows the continued operation of collective gardens (while personal cultivation is prohibited by 1-502), nominally-regulated “dispensaries” (outside of and in competition with state-sanctioned sales), and access for youth and adolescents who obtain parental consent to obtain a Medical Marijuana card.”

This second file is an email showing a list of who the LCB was really consulting for their implementation while public hearings were going on…

HIDTA-MMJ Repeal by 420leaks

Whos Who by 420leaks

Two of the many records of OPMA advice to the board are also attached, with redactions, as well as a brief with some background, and a second order stating that the Rules of professional conduct ensure that they won’t lie about the contents of the redacted OPMA advice.

Lcb Schalller Order by 420leaks

Lcb Oct 20 Opma Reply by 420leaks

The State is withholding the advice on the OPMA provided to the LCB while attempting to argue that the Board members lacked knowledge that the 17 meetings with law enforcement, cities and counties, and the prevention community were not public meetings.

LCB OPMA 00000459 by 420leaks

LCB OPMA 00000196 by 420leaks

On March 22, 2013, LCB Executive director Rick Garza testified before the House finance Committee

“…(in) the public forums the board spent four hours, usually in the evening, taking testimony but I think a lot of the work that was done during the morning and afternoon in meeting with the prevention community, with city officials and county officials separately and then with law enforcement and I think that it was in those meetings that we learned a lot about some of the issues and challenges that we have at the Liquor Control Board. And I think the first one we would move to is medical marijuana…”

From the complaint: List of Secret Meetings in 2013 (Court Order has the wrong year)

  1. On at least Eight dates the LCB Board met to deliberate on official LCB business outside of the context of a public meeting.
  2. The Board or a quorum thereof conducted deliberations of January 24 in Seattle, (10:15-11:15 A.M with the prevention Community, 1:30-2:30. (two other meetings were plead, with (1) Nick Licata and (2) Pete Holmes-Law Enforcement that afternoon, but were not found by the court to be violations)
  3. The Board or a quorum thereof conducted deliberations on February 7 in Vancouver, (11:00-12:00 with law enforcement, 1:00-2:00 with Prevention community 3:00-4:00 with local government officials)
  4. The Board or a quorum thereof conducted deliberations in Spokane on February 11 (2:45-3:45 with the Chase Youth Commission, and on February 12 (10:00-11:00 with law enforcement, 11:00-12:00 with Prevention community, 2:00-4:00 with Spokane City Council) and February 13 at Northwest Medical.
  5. The Board or a quorum thereof conducted deliberations on February 19 in Mount Vernon, (1:00-2:00 with law enforcement, 3:00-4:00 with the Prevention community)
  6. The Board or a quorum thereof conducted deliberations on February 21 in Tacoma, (11:00-12:00 with law enforcement, 1:00-2:00 with Prevention community)
  7. The Board or a quorum thereof conducted deliberations of February 28 in Yakima, (11:00-12:00 with law enforcement, 1:00-2:00 with Prevention community)
  8. The Board or a quorum thereof conducted deliberations on March 7 in Bremerton, (1:00-2:00 with Prevention community, 3:00-4:00 with law enforcement)
  9. These meetings were held all across the State in various locations during the morning and afternoons prior to the scheduled “public hearings” that the LCB held for the implementation of I-502. However, while the nocturnal public hearings provided cover for the LCB Board to travel all across the State, what they were in actuality doing was meeting in private with Cities, Counties, Law enforcement and entities referred to as “The prevention community”. Significantly, in testimony to the Legislature, LCB representatives revealed that the private meetings provided some of the best information that the Board used to adopt the proposed I-502 rules.


Associated Press coverage:
In State:
Seattle Times
Yakima Herald
The Columbian
Tacoma News Tribune
Kitsap Sun

Washington Times

Is I-502 a trick or treat for voters and patients?

By John Novak

As people across  state of Washington celebrate Halloween, we would like to take time to reflect on I-502.  Has it been a trick or a treat for voters, taxpayers and medical patients since the initiative passed in 2012?

With more than 40% of the state’s cities banning the businesses, it looks like the voters in those areas without stores have been tricked.

However,  consumers in areas that have allowed stores to open have also been tricked into paying huge prices on miniscule amounts of product.

While cannabis prices have remained at a steady average of $10 per gram in both the medical and black market since like 1985, it’s at least double that, if not more, in the I-502 stores.  Quality is suspect, as is consistency.

For now, the campaign promise of reducing the black market have been a trick.

Have promises by the main sponsors been fulfilled?

Tax revenue from I-502 was promised to be in the hundreds of millions.  Stores were opened earlier this summer and as of early October, the total amount to the state was $3.5 Million.  Nowhere near the projected amount.

So what are the positive things about I-502?

Some jurisdictions have seen a decrease in marijuana arrests.  It hasn’t stopped the racial profiling, as Seattle found out when a single officer accounted for the vast majority of tickets handed out to mainly people of color for “public display”.

About the only other thing we can think of is it has helped spark new conversations at the national level.  And that has been a treat since now more states are now jumping on the bandwagon.

Sponsors of the initiative said this would happen if passed, even if the language was flawed.  And they readily admitted the flaws. The mantra became, “pass it now, fix it later”.

That was nothing more than a trick as nothing has been done to fix it is since it passed. They knew the taxes were too high.  Once it passed, the sponsors disappeared into the night like kid who got his candy and is off to the next handout down the road.

More importantly, They knew it would threaten he rights of medical patients, even though they claimed publicly it would be a treat for us.  In fact, the patients were told to roll over and die and take one for the team.

Since passing, law enforcement and the legislators, with the help of the media, have launched an all out assault to completely discredit and dismantle nearly everything in our medical cannabis laws.

They blame the medical community for undermining the recreational stores by selling cannabis at $10 per gram.  A neat trick to avoid the obvious: an overtaxed and over regulated I-502 model will never be able to beat that price.  Especially when the IRS adds in their take.

They say most of the patients are fake, claiming upwards of 90% don’t have qualifying conditions in spite of the glaring fact that not a single credible shred of evidence has ever been submitted to back up this claim.

With all this trickery going on, perhaps the most obvious glaring hole in the entire plan has been the use of the term “legal”.

While the complaints about medical undermining recreational, this has been a trick to convince people that I-502 is somehow more legal in the eyes of the federal government.

Well, the trick is, they are no more legal in the eyes of federal law than they were before I-502 was passed.

When the feds released their guidelines for state regarding cannabis regulations (remember the Cole Memo?), the last paragraph was largely ignored:  Cannabis is illegal and we will come after you at any time and you have zero defense against us doing so.

It is well past time in the state for patients to start being treated with dignity and compassion.  Not tricked into giving up hard won rights to use cannabis to treat our medical conditions.

Both the state and federal government must end this trick or treat politics on cannabis.

By the way, did you know the federal government owns patents on the medical use of cannabis and has been sending out tins filled with joints to a small group of patients?

Trick or treat, America!

UPDATE:  Just moments after writing this article, the Associated Press released a story about how the WSLCB broke the Open Public Meetings Act 17 times.  See the story on KOMO 4 News:

Also at with links to relevant documents